<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com">
<title>Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders current issue</title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>November 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1756-2856</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/393?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/401?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/413?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tan.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders</title>
<url>http://tan.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benefit of repetitive intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide therapy in predominantly spinal multiple sclerosis: prediction by upper spinal cord atrophy]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Intrathecal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) has been shown to provide substantial benefit in a subset of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with predominant spinal symptoms. We examined whether atrophy of the upper spinal cord (USC) as measured by MRI can serve as a predictive marker for response to repetitive intrathecal TCA application. Repetitive administration of 40 mg TCA was performed in 31 chronic progressive MS patients up to six times within 3 weeks. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and maximum walking distance (WD) were assessed before and after the treatment cycle. Cervical 3D T1-weighted images were acquired on a 1.5T scanner at baseline. Mean cross-sectional area of the USC was determined using a semi-automated volumetry method. Results were compared with a group of 29 healthy controls to group patients into those with and without atrophy. Results show a negative correlation between the degree of USC atrophy and treatment benefit. A higher treatment benefit in patients with little USC atrophy but short initial maximum WD was observed. Absence of USC atrophy as measured on MRI is a predictive marker for intrathecal TCA therapy outcome in progressive MS. Patients with initial poor walking abilities, but only little or no atrophy, benefited most from TCA therapy.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukas, C., Bellenberg, B., Hahn, H. K., Rexilius, J., Drescher, R., Hellwig, K., Koster, O., Schimrigk, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609343480</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benefit of repetitive intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide therapy in predominantly spinal multiple sclerosis: prediction by upper spinal cord atrophy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), there are currently six approved medications that have been shown to alter the natural course of the disease. The approved medications include three beta interferon formulations, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and mitoxantrone. Treating aggressive forms of RRMS and progressive disease forms of MS still presents a great challenge to neurologists. Intense immunosuppression has long been thought to be the only feasible therapeutic option. In patients with progressive forms of MS, lymphoid tissues have been detected in the central nervous system (CNS) that may play a critical role in perpetuating local inflammation. Agents that are currently approved for patients with MS have no or very limited bioavailability in the brain and spinal cord. In contrast, cyclophosphamide (CYC), an alkylating agent, penetrates the blood-brain barrier and CNS parenchyma well. However, while CYC has been used in clinical trials and off-label in clinical practice in patients with MS for over three decades, data on its efficacy in very heterogeneous groups of study patients have been conflicting. New myeloablative treatment paradigms with CYC may provide a therapeutic option in patients that do not respond to other agents. In this article we review the scientific rationale that led to the initial clinical trials with CYC. We will also outline the safety, tolerability and efficacy of CYC and provide neurologists with guidelines for its use in patients with MS and other inflammatory disorders of the CNS, including neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Finally, an outlook into relatively novel treatment approaches is provided.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Awad, A., Stuve, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609344375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>368</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Identifying patient subtypes in multiple sclerosis and tailoring immunotherapy: challenges for the future]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The accelerating pace of technological and analytical development in the fields of genetic and phenotypic profiling has ushered in an era of great promise for multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As we continue to identify modest but meaningful associations to MS susceptibility, disease course, treatment response, and other clinical or paraclinical phenotypes, we must begin to (1) embark on the challenging set of studies that will integrate disparate observations into clinical algorithms, and (2) validate their clinical utility. Genetic data are receiving much of the attention today, but they are unlikely to be sufficient to offer a personalized approach to disease management in MS. Rather, the genetic architecture of the disease, once uncovered, will offer a fixed platform upon which more dynamic molecular profiles can be assembled to deconstruct the structure of the patient population that we label with a diagnosis of MS. The tools and methods to gain insight into the heterogeneity of MS patients are available today; we must now realize their potential in enhancing the care of MS patients.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Jager, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609337976</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Identifying patient subtypes in multiple sclerosis and tailoring immunotherapy: challenges for the future]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>During the last 15 years deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established as a highly-effective therapy for advanced Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD). Patient selection, stereotactic implantation, postoperative stimulator programming and patient care requires a multi-disciplinary team including movement disorders specialists in neurology and functional neurosurgery. To treat medically refractory levodopa-induced motor complications or resistant tremor the preferred target for high-frequency DBS is the subthalamic nucleus (STN). STN-DBS results in significant reduction of dyskinesias and dopaminergic medication, improvement of all cardinal motor symptoms with sustained long-term benefits, and significant improvement of quality of life when compared with best medical treatment. These benefits have to be weighed against potential surgery-related adverse events, device-related complications, and stimulus-induced side effects. The mean disease duration before initiating DBS in PD is currently about 13 years. It is presently investigated whether the optimal timing for implantation may be at an earlier disease-stage to prevent psychosocial decline and to maintain quality of life for a longer period of time.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groiss, S.J., Wojtecki, L., Sudmeyer, M., Schnitzler, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609339382</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/393?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Improving symptom control in early Parkinson's disease]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/393?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Motor symptoms in Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD) are caused by a severe loss of pigmented dopamine-producing nigro-striatal neurons. Symptomatic therapies provide benefit for motor features by restoring dopamine receptor stimulation. Studies have demonstrated that delaying the introduction of dopaminergic medical therapy is associated with a rapid decline in quality of life. Nonmotor symptoms, such as depression, are common in early PD and also affect quality of life. Therefore, dopaminergic therapy should typically be initiated at, or shortly following, diagnosis. Monamine oxidase-B inhibitors provide mild symptomatic benefit, have excellent side effect profiles, and may improve long-term outcomes, making them an important first-line treatment option. Dopamine agonists (DAs) provide moderate symptomatic benefit but are associated with more side effects than levodopa. However, they delay the development of motor complications by delaying the need for levodopa. Levodopa (LD) is the most efficacious medication, but its chronic use is associated with the development of motor complications that can be difficult to resolve. Younger patients are more likely to develop levodopa-induced motor complications and they are therefore often treated with a DA before levodopa is added. For older patients, levodopa provides good motor benefit with a relatively low-risk of motor complications. Using levodopa with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor lessens adverse effects, and further adding a catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor can improve symptom control.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaacson, S. H., Hauser, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609339383</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Improving symptom control in early Parkinson's disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>400</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>393</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/401?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Pathophysiology and treatment of bacterial meningitis]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/401?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Bacterial meningitis is a medical emergency requiring immediate diagnosis and immediate treatment. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis are the most common and most aggressive pathogens of meningitis. Emerging antibiotic resistance is an upcoming challenge. Clinical and experimental studies have established a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms resulting in brain damage, sequelae and neuropsychological deficits. We summarize the current pathophysiological concept of acute bacterial meningitis and present current treatment strategies.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoffman, O., Weber, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:12 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609337975</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Pathophysiology and treatment of bacterial meningitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>412</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>401</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/413?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://tan.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/413?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:56:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756285609353674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>413</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>413</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>